Comments on: Why IIS on Win32 Fails http://www.paralipsis.org/2006/04/why-iis-on-win32-fails/ paralipsis: suggesting by deliberately concise treatment that much of significance is omitted Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:41:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.3 by: Computerworld Blogs http://www.paralipsis.org/2006/04/why-iis-on-win32-fails/#comment-222 Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:29:48 +0000 http://www.paralipsis.org/2006/04/why-iis-on-win32-fails/#comment-222 <strong>Windows+IIS vs. Linux+Apache (and baby vs. baby)</strong> Holy weblog observations, Batman! It's IT Blogwatch, in which it's &#34;proven&#34; than Windows+IIS is less secure than Linux+Apache. Not to mention the site that asks, &#34;Which baby is cuter?&#34;... Windows+IIS vs. Linux+Apache (and baby vs. baby)

Holy weblog observations, Batman! It’s IT Blogwatch, in which it’s "proven" than Windows+IIS is less secure than Linux+Apache. Not to mention the site that asks, "Which baby is cuter?"…

]]>