<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why IIS on Win32 Fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paralipsis.org/2006/04/why-iis-on-win32-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paralipsis.org/2006/04/why-iis-on-win32-fails/</link>
	<description>paralipsis: suggesting by deliberately concise treatment that much of significance is omitted</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Computerworld Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.paralipsis.org/2006/04/why-iis-on-win32-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Computerworld Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paralipsis.org/?p=74#comment-222</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Windows+IIS vs. Linux+Apache (and baby vs. baby)&lt;/strong&gt;

Holy weblog observations, Batman! It&#039;s IT Blogwatch, in which it&#039;s &quot;proven&quot; than Windows+IIS is less secure than Linux+Apache. Not to mention the site that asks, &quot;Which baby is cuter?&quot;...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Windows+IIS vs. Linux+Apache (and baby vs. baby)</strong></p>
<p>Holy weblog observations, Batman! It&#8217;s IT Blogwatch, in which it&#8217;s &quot;proven&quot; than Windows+IIS is less secure than Linux+Apache. Not to mention the site that asks, &quot;Which baby is cuter?&quot;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
